Cameron says he wants a debate but Labour leader says PM should âstop ducking and weaving and should name the dateâ

David Cameron has defended his decision not to face Ed Miliband in a head-to-head televised party leader debate ahead of the general election, after being accused of running scared.
Cameron insisted that he wanted there to be a debate and that he was trying to âunblock the logjamâ created by the broadcasters. He argued that if the debate was held once election campaigning had formally started after the dissolution of parliament on 30 March, it would distract from the important issues.
The Labour leader renewed his call to Cameron to face him in the one-on-one debate proposed by broadcasters on 30 April, saying that the prime minister was âcowering from the publicâ.
âThe British people deserve this debateâ, he said. âIâll debate him any time, any place, anywhere. He should stop ducking and weaving and he should name the date.â
On Wednesday, Downing Street made what it called a final offer to broadcasters that the prime minister would take part in just one debate featuring seven party leaders before the formal campaign begins next month. Hours after Miliband challenged Cameron to meet him âany time, any place, anywhereâ, Downing Street ruled out a one-on-one debate after accusing the broadcasters of allowing the negotiations to descend into chaos.
The intervention by the prime ministerâs director of communications, Craig Oliver, prompted an angry backlash from the other political parties. Douglas Alexander, the chair of Labourâs election campaign, accused No 10 of an âoutrageousâ attempt to bully the broadcasters into dropping their proposal for a debate between Cameron and Miliband.
Speaking on his weekly radio phone-in show on LBC on Thursday morning, Nick Clegg said he couldnât get over the âlofty pomposity of the Conservativesâ. He said: âItâs as if they think theyâre ordering a drink in the drawing room of Downton Abbey, telling everybody else what they should do. Itâs not for one party to grandly tell everybody else whatâs going to happen.â
He offered to stand in for the prime minister in a head-to-head with Miliband: âIf David Cameron is too busy and too important to defend he record of this government, then I offer myself.â
The former Liberal Democrat leader and chair of the partyâs election campaign, Paddy Ashdown, accused Cameron of being âfritâ and pointed out that the debate proposed by Downing Street would be held before the Conservative party had published its election manifesto.
Alastair Campbell, former director of communications for Tony Blair, called the development âdemocratically wrong and morally cowardlyâ. He said the prime minister was âwriggling and weasellingâ out of debates and he thought Miliband would probably persevere and take part in debates without Cameron. âEverybody knows that Craig Oliver has a brief to make sure these debates do not happen,â Campbell told the BBCâs Today programme.
He admitted that he had advised Blair not to take part in debates prior to the 1997 general election. âI was worried that the focus of the campaign would all be about these debates, but theyâve now happened and that was 20 years ago. And whatâs more they happened because David Cameron, no less, said back in 2010 they were fundamental to the democratic process.â Campbell added: âIf you go around saying that Ed Miliband is the most terrible, weak, useless leader that weâve ever had, why in that case wonât he debate against him?â
A Ukip spokesman said Cameron was âacting chickenâ and leader Nigel Farage, speaking on ITVâs Loose Women said: âHeâs sabotaged the whole thing. Heâs now saying heâll do one debate, but heâll do it before the proper campaign starts so itâs not going to be a proper debate and Ofcom, the regulator, said there were four major parties in British politics â Lib, Lab, Con and us â and on that same day he said âwell, surely the Greens have to be involvedâ. And now thereâs going to be actually, a debate â if it happens at all â with more people than weâve got sitting on this panel
now. How is it going to work?â
The Green party said Cameronâs âswerveâ would further damage trust in the political system. âNot only is Cameronâs announcement cowardly but it also shows his contempt for the electorate,â the party said, adding that Natalie Bennett was very much looking forward to the debates.
The Scottish National party leader, Nicola Sturgeon, accused the prime minister of running scared. âThis arrogance in trying to lay down the law is all about getting out of debates, not taking part,â she said.
The row erupted on Wednesday after Oliver sent an email to the chair of the broadcastersâ leadersâ debate committee, Sue Inglish, to say he was making a final offer, by which Cameron take part in one 90-minute debate between the seven party leaders. The debate would have to take place before the dissolution of parliament, in the week beginning 23 March.
Oliver wrote: âThis is our final offer, and to be clear, given the fact this has been a deeply unsatisfactory process and we are within a month of the short campaign, the prime minister will not be participating in more than one debate.â
The broadcasters issued a neutral statement in which they suggested they were still committed to holding more than one debate. In a joint statement, the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Sky News said the three debates between the three main party leaders in 2010 had been watched by 22 million people and had engaged voters. âThe broadcasters have set out their proposals and continue to talk to all the relevant parties on an equitable basis. We will respond to the Conservativesâ proposal in due course.â
The move by No 10 shows that Cameron is determined to achieve one of two goals: kill the debates altogether or ensure that they turn into what one senior Tory has described as a âdemocratic bore-athonâ, that would dilute the impact of Nigel Farage.
Oliver said the debate should include Cameron, Miliband, Clegg, Sturgeon, Bennett and the Plaid Cymru leader, Leanne Wood. Nigel Dodds, the Democratic Unionist Party leader, should be allowed to make the case for why he should attend, said Oliver.































